• Blog Tools:
  • Comment
  • Read Comments
  • Text Size:
  • Small Text Size
  • Normal Text Size
  • Large Text Size

Category: Dumbing down America

Posted by George Bullard on Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM

Anal school rules broom 6-year-old for knife, fork, and spoon

So now a public school district, in its infinite wisdom, has kicked out a six-year-old cub scout because he brought his camp eating utensil to school.

It's a weapon, gasp school officials, referring to a fork, knife and spoon set.

Europeans may be right. Americans are losing our edge.

The ousted student, Zachary Christie, wanted to show pals his new Cub Scout widget. But district rules seem to equate to equate a knife, fork and spoon with, say, the high powered pistols used at the Virginia Tech campus shootings.

Zero Tolerance. No automatic pistols, no handgrenade, no knife, fork and spoon.

Nevermind the effect of an unfair suspension or expulsion on Zachary. It's the same rule that got a little girl broomed from school because her grandmother sent her class with a cake, and a knife to cut it.

Exactly when did we lose common sense? I'm not sure. But I'm fairly certain absentee parenting and U.S. public education had something to do with it over the years -- not teaching critical thinking, or much else worthwhile for that matter, if student test scores are any indication. Generally speaking, of course. Some of my best friends are K-12 teachers.

K-12, and college to some extent, has become something of a warehouse. A place to stash offspring while they take an ungodly amount of time to grow up.

My dad gave me a pocket knife when I joined Cub Scouts, at age 8. I've carried pocket knives for decades and have cut neither myself nor anyone else. A useful everyday tool. Millions of others use one, too. Perfectly safe activity. Scouting used to teach knife safety, and I suppose they still do.

In Zachary's case, anal-retentative school rules projected unreasonable adult fears on a decent kid. A knife, fork and spoon is, per se, not threatening. Nor is Zachary.

In meting out punishments, how about considering Zachary's intent? Does anybody give a kid a break anymore? In the real world, the one removed from school board meetings, you can even kill somebody and not serve a day in day in jail. Self-defense is accepted as necessary from time to time. Intent counts.

And this from the New York Times: There's no evidence that Zero Tolerance makes schools safer.

Here for story.

And here for a website to free Zachary Christie.

  • Comment  | 
  • Read All Comments  | 
  • Link  | 
  • Save and Share

Comments

Jump to bottom
Tue. 10/13/09 12:16 PM

A what?

No, I'm thinking Mr. B meant "anal", as in "anal retentive", as in "uptight, rigid". Which is what these rules, and rulings, are. Why use critical thinking and make decisions when we can invoke "zero tolerance" rules and not think at all? Brilliant example, particularly in an educational setting.

Almanian, Howell, MI

Yeah, you're right. Anal, the short form of anal-retentive, which is referenced down in the blog.

"Anal-retentive" is just too much to squeeze into a headline.

--Bullard

Tue. 10/13/09 10:52 AM

Anal?

Anal? Don't you mean anile, as in the female equivalent of senile....which the editors must be to have let this one get past them. No wonder the News has become a joke around here!

Bigred1, Birmingham, MI

"Anile" could work. But I like "anal," as in this dictionary definition: "A collection of very irritating personality traits that include stubbornness, orderliness, and a desire to control others and their surroundings."

Is that Bigred1 as in the Army's famed infantry division?

--B.

Jump to top
  • Blog Tools:
  • Comment
  • Read Comments
  • Text Size:
  • Small Text Size
  • Normal Text Size
  • Large Text Size

About this Weblog

Raging BULLard

George Bullard, a former Detroit News editorial writer, is now a freelance writer. His perspectives stem from years tracking local, state and federal governments for The News.

Advertisement